Re: toward domain names in the public interest

At 08:45 AM 9/26/01 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > For at least some things, we need a system that
> > is more stable with less administrative overhead
> > than your proposal.
>Ah... then you agree it's potentially a good idea?
>Yes, I'd like to see something more scalable too.

If you accept the value of some names being allocated through a consensus 
process, doesn't that rather limit the extent of scalability (of such 

Which, BTW, I think is not necessarily a bad thing.  (As someone said here 
recently, the great thing about standards is that there are so many to 
chose from.)


Graham Klyne

Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 10:59:20 UTC