W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > September 2001

RE: Excess URI schemes considered harmful

From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:03:50 +0200
To: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 <Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com>, "'Rob Lanphier'" <robla@real.com>
Cc: uri@w3.org, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, Dan Zigmond <djz@corp.webtv.net>, Rich Petke <rpetke@wcom.net>
Message-ID: <342859786.1001459030@localhost>
it would be quite useful if your draft would explain better WHY you need a 
mapping between these two quite dissimilar name spaces.

I have trouble imagining the case where you would want to use it.


--On 25. september 2001 16:41 -0400 Eastlake III Donald-LDE008 
<Donald.Eastlake@motorola.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the endorsement.  I've been a bit remise in working on my
> draft recently.  I plan to make one more very minor pass over it, post an
> updated version, and then request IESG action as a Proposed Standard. But
> I'm certainly open to receiving comments now and, if the IESG chooses to
> proceed, there will be an opportunity for the community to comment during
> the Last Call.
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 17:14:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:39 UTC