Re: Excess URI schemes considered harmful

At 10:30 AM 9/25/01 -0700, Rob Lanphier wrote:
>There's nothing wrong with there being a well-known location for IANA 
>URLs.  However, many mechanisms defined by the W3C rely on URIs as a means 
>of expressing registry information (SMIL systemComponent is the one I'm 
>primarily interested in, but I understand CC/PP has a similar concern). ...

The combination of:
   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mealling-iana-urn-01.txt
and
   http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klyne-urn-ietf-conneg-00.txt
is an attempt to deal with the CC/PP concerns.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
GK@NineByNine.org

Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2001 17:12:40 UTC