- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:59:01 +0100
- To: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, <uri@w3.org>
> From: uri-request@w3.org [mailto:uri-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim > Whitehead > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:53 PM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org; uri@w3.org > Subject: RE: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency > > > > I think it might help people to better understand the set of possible > solutions to this issue if I point out that WebDAV implementations are NOT > going to support any change that leads to a reduction in interoperability. > > So, for example, any suggestion that begins, "just change > WebDAV's namespace > identifier to ...." is not going to work. Of course. So - a new namespace name would be needed - the old one would need to be deprecated - interoperability of all combinations of new/old servers needs to be investigated In theory the revision of RFC2518 could deprecate "DAV:" in favor of "somenewuri", right? > Complain to me all you wish about this -- you'll just be shooting the > messenger. Whose messenger?
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 12:59:39 UTC