- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:57:00 +0200
- To: distobj@acm.org, uri@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: ext Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org] > Sent: 22 November, 2001 00:05 > To: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere) > Subject: Re: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency > > > (not to the list) > > > > IMO, a URI scheme has identity, and so should be able to > be identified > > > by a URI reference. > > > > Right. Insofar as RDF is concerned, which provides for a > > concatenative mapping from qname to URI, you could do the > > following: > > > > <dav:creationdate xmlns:dav="dav:"/> > > > > Where "dav:" is both a URI denoting the URI scheme, and an xmlns > > prefix. Which is which is 100% clear in the XML syntax. > > But "dav:" is not a URI, as it meets no valid URI production. I'm aware of that. My proposal was specifically: URI ::= scheme ":" URI ::= "urn" ":" <NID> ":" The first case is not a valid URI for the scheme, but is a valid URI denoting the scheme. The second case is not a valid URI for the URN namespace, but is a valid URI denoting the URN namespace. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2001 01:57:20 UTC