- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 23:18:33 PDT
- To: "Patrik Fältström" <paf@swip.net>, "Vaha-Sipila Antti (NMP)" <antti.vaha-sipila@nmp.nokia.com>
- Cc: <uri@Bunyip.Com>, <eva@nic-se.se>
I wasn't ever suggesting that the base could change. The only issue is that you can set up a context "tel://1/650/812/" against which local numbers "4365", "4333" could be resolved. I think this is of marginal value, but on the other hand, a notation that made it clear that "tel:12345" was somehow a relative name with a missing component would be a _good thing_. And people are used to "//" in URLs, they sometimes add them anyway (I've seen mailto://masinter@parc.xerox.com even) , but getting folks to add the "+" might be hard. > They did see problems with the suggestion from you when the case happens > that one number changes area code (or the area code disappears like in > Denmark), i.e. that the base changes in the relative URL you are > describing. I don't understand what the problem is. Could you explain the "problems with the suggestion from me"? If I say "base = tel://1/415/812/" and then it changes to "base = tel://1/650/812/" for some numbers and stays the same for others (as happened), now I have to make some of the relative numbers into absolute, and leave the rest relative. Why is that more of a problem than having to change every number? > It is definitely not the case that the base changes from one to > another one the same way for several numbers at the same time. I never claimed it was. > It is, to > use their wording, unlikely that the base of phone numbers changes the > same for all numbers in the same base, even inside a country code like > Sweden. Of course not; mainly the codes split. > According to them, each phone number is individual, is allocated in blocks > which have nothing to do with the area code or such, and each number is > also changed individually when they need to change. Yes, I didn't think so. I'm not sure what point you are making, though. > It is also the case that some allocations (for example according to a > proposal for a "411"-service within the global 118 number series in Sweden, > which I think is stupid, but anyways) are hierarichal because of a > _postfix_ and not prefix. The format for this number is 118yxx, where y='0' > and y='5' is saved for national services, while the industry can ask for at > most two numbers in this series for national and international services. Then there is no short form. I'm not sure why this is a counterexample, though. > Telephone industry is not at all the same as number allocation, which > happens on local level within each country, and in some cases also in > organizations like the EU. I don't think that the proposal for telephone numbering form makes any assumptions about the telephone industry. Larry
Received on Tuesday, 30 June 1998 02:23:28 UTC