- From: Klaus Weide <kweide@tezcat.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 18:32:35 -0500 (CDT)
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- cc: uri@bunyip.com
On Fri, 24 Oct 1997, Al Gilman wrote:
> [response 1 -- fragments as we know them]
>
> The general URL syntax draft wisely avoids trying to give a
> uniform concept or specfication for the the interpretation of
> #fragment substrings in URL references.
>
> Note that the "fragment" in this syntax symbol should therefore
> be read as "this fragment of the textual URL-reference," not "the
> cited fragment of the referenced resource" even though in the
> common case of http: URLs referring to HTML documents either
> interpretation fits.
Can you explain what you mean with that last paragraph?
I don't understand the distinction you are trying to make here,
or why the two sentences are connected by "therefore".
Klaus
Received on Friday, 24 October 1997 19:33:00 UTC