Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 11:47:01 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@innosoft.com> Subject: Re: Use of ";" in relative URLs: procedural issue? In-Reply-To: <"97Feb3.082628pdt.241"@palimpsest.parc.xerox.com> To: IETF URI list <email@example.com> Message-Id: <Pine.SOL.3.95.970203114133.13853Ifirstname.lastname@example.org> On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, Larry Masinter wrote: > This is quite attractive, and is important for some schemes. No one > seems to implement this currently, though, so introducing it at this > point seems like we would at least have to start over at "Proposed > Standard", and should only do so if the consensus of the community is > that this is the right thing to do. > > So, do you think this is the right thing to do? As I don't believe recycling at Proposed will cause significant deployment problems with URLs (I can't think of a more widely deployed Internet protocol :-), and I think this is a good idea, I'm all for the change. Especially since the IMAP URL scheme needs it, IMHO.