- From: Francois Yergeau <yergeau@alis.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 10:22:34 -0400
- To: uri@bunyip.com
À 00:25 25-04-97 -0500, Dan Connolly a écrit : >> Let's see: we would have an i18n RFC that would allow URLs to contain most >> any characters, and a (possibly Draft) standard that would say "All URLs >> consist of a restricted set of characters..." (we know which): clear >> contradiction. > >Please don't cite out of context or paraphrase wildly. The _existing_ >RFC limits the characters in URLs. In fact, the UTF-8-in-%XX encoding >propsal doesn't even change that: it just adds semantics to the syntax. I'm sorry, but I see it differently: the UTF-8-in-%XX proposal doesn't add octet values on-the-wire, but it adds, and correctly maps, thousands of characters. >>From what I can see, Larry is the only guy around here volunteering >to be editor; as such, it's up to him to decide whether it's more >convenient to present the ideas in one document or two. Well, I think Martin has volunteered too, at least to some extent. And I wouldn't mind if it were purely a presentation issue, as you imply, but I don't think it is. The issue is what will be standardized as *the* URL syntax. Regards, -- François Yergeau <yergeau@alis.com> Alis Technologies Inc., Montréal Tél : +1 (514) 747-2547 Fax : +1 (514) 747-2561
Received on Friday, 25 April 1997 10:22:38 UTC