- From: Edward Cherlin <cherlin@newbie.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 02:17:27 -0700
- To: uri@bunyip.com
Out of all of this noise, I detected a real issue. %HH encoding is used for non-character data. Using it for UTF-8 at the same time would be ambiguous. I don't know how often this conflict would arise, but it is a real issue. So we need another solution. That might mean we want another encoding of the UTF-8 which can be distinguished from %HH. However, this is a separate issue. The rest of the noise seems to be about how much of the problem Martin's proposal would solve, with answers ranging from "none at all" to "quite a lot", and about how much it needs to solve, with answers ranging from "everything" to "a fair amount" respectively. I would suggest a retreat from the "Yes, it works!" "No, it doesn't!" style of argument to the Quaker method of verifying that you understand the question before firing off answers, except that I would expect to be roundly ignored. [sigh] -- Edward Cherlin cherlin@newbie.net Everything should be made Vice President Ask. Someone knows. as simple as possible, NewbieNet, Inc. __but no simpler__. http://www.newbie.net/ Attributed to Albert Einstein
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 1997 11:23:06 UTC