- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 1996 16:05:53 PDT
- To: eguttman@spar.incog.com
- Cc: uri@bunyip.com
I know the folks working on ILU (ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/ilu/ilu.html) were working on a URL format for ILU object ports that might not be IPv4. And certainly HTTP URLs need not refer to the IPv4 host, they could refer to IPv6. (There was a recent message on http-wg on this point, but I'm having trouble finding it at the moment.) I think the main issue for new URL schemes is that we're currently expecting them to be defined by RFCs. But if you have positive proposals, why don't you bring them forward? While URI-WG might revive with a new (very narrow) charter to review the (soon-to-be) revised URL / relative URL drafts and push them toward Draft Standard, it's likely not to be in a position to vet completely new schemes. Larry
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 1996 19:06:34 UTC