W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > November 1995

Re: Vetting rules for UR* schemes

From: <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 23:30:11 +0100
Message-Id: <199511262230.XAA07978@dale.uninett.no>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Cc: uri@bunyip.com, klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net
here's what I added.
Do you think it is clear enough?


<h2>Is it relative-URL compatible?</h2>
Many applications know and love relative URLs. Therefore, the
following questions must be asked:
  <li> Can it be parsed according to RFC 1808 - that is, if the tokens
       "//", "/", ";", "?" and "#" are used, do they have the meaning
       given in RFC 1808?
  <li> Does it make sense to use it in relative URLs like those RFC
       1808 specifies?
  <li> Are there ways of using pieces of the information inside it
       that implementations are supposed to get right?
Received on Monday, 27 November 1995 23:39:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:32 UTC