W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > uri@w3.org > November 1995

Re: Vetting rules for UR* schemes

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@avron.ICS.UCI.EDU>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 1995 02:09:15 -0800
To: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
Cc: uri@bunyip.com, klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net
Message-Id: <9511250209.aa06921@paris.ics.uci.edu>
One thing missing:

   Does the scheme intend to be used in relative forms?
   If so, can it be parsed using the generic-RL BNF of RFC 1808
      and retain the correct semantics?

Actually, I think the latter should be a requirement of any hierarchical
scheme, even if it isn't intended to be relative.

 ...Roy T. Fielding
    Department of Information & Computer Science    (fielding@ics.uci.edu)
    University of California, Irvine, CA 92717-3425    fax:+1(714)824-4056
Received on Saturday, 25 November 1995 05:12:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sunday, 10 October 2021 22:17:32 UTC