Message-Id: <199506221557.LAA12221@info.cren.net> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:59:26 -0500 To: Leslie Daigle <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Jim Conklin) Subject: Re: whither URI I think Leslie is right about the need to keep close and careful coordination between the groups working on the addressing, resolution, metadata of UR's (and I might add architecture, since I have this feeling that an architecture is what we're somewhat unsuccessfully working around), and that they need to proceed in parallel, not serially in order to have that coordination. I am concerned about overload, though, which I believe is what motivated Larry's and Keith's comments. Jim At 10:08 AM 6/22/95 -0400, Leslie Daigle wrote: >I disagree that these things should be done serially, and I am not suggesting >that they should all be done in one working group. ... > >What I have said is the that the URI group should continue to consider some >metadata issues, at the level of architecting resource location/discovery >tools. > .. >On the other hand, with a certain amount of vision, we can do more than >just stack engineering hack upon engineering hack. > >Leslie.