Re: URNs, handles, and Stockholm

Michael Mealling (Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu)
Wed, 14 Jun 1995 18:11:13 -0400 (EDT)


From: Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu (Michael Mealling)
Message-Id: <199506142211.SAA26669@oit.gatech.edu>
Subject: Re: URNs, handles, and Stockholm
To: warms@CNRI.Reston.VA.US (William Y. Arms)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 18:11:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: uri@bunyip.com, dely@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
In-Reply-To: <ac0505f30802100406ce@[132.151.1.217]> from "William Y. Arms" at Jun 14, 95 05:40:06 pm

William Y. Arms said this:
> At Stockholm, we can demonstrate storing and resolving handles,
> adminstrative tools, security, use of caching and proxy servers, etc.
> Currently there are several million handles loaded in the system which can
> be used for stress testing, etc.  Alternatively, it is straightforward to
> do mathematical analysis of the system, given assumptions about patterns of
> use, but harder to guess what patterns will emerge.  What other preparation
> should we make for the meeting?

I don't want to sound like I'm whining here but this is what concerns me.
Some of the URN schemes discussed are being developed by people who have
no budget and one programmer while others have massive development arms.

I realize we do have to write the thing but I would hope we develope
selection criteria that try and weed out influences based on the size
of ones development resources....

-MM

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Life is a game. Someone wins and someone loses. Get used to it.
<BR>
<HR><A HREF="http://www.gatech.edu/michael.html">Michael Mealling</A>