Re: Another round of the mailserver URL

Alexander Dupuy (dupuy@smarts.com)
Fri, 7 Jul 1995 17:31:09 -0400


Date: Fri, 7 Jul 1995 17:31:09 -0400
From: dupuy@smarts.com (Alexander Dupuy)
Message-Id: <9507072131.AA01588@just.smarts.com>
To: uri@bunyip.com, ietf-lists@proper.com
Subject: Re: Another round of the mailserver URL

> Please review this new draft so we can be sure it reflects the consensus of
> the WG.

I noticed that the suggestion that clients implementing the mailserver URL put
a header into generated messages indicating the source of the mailserver
URL which generated the message didn't make it into the new draft.  This seems
like an extremely useful feature, not just for identifying the culprits in
cases where URLs are used to deliver, but also for mailserver administrators
who may be interested in how people are finding out about them.

Was there a reason that no such suggestion was made?

@alex
--
inet: dupuy@smarts.com
Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- write to lpf@uunet.uu.net
GCS d?@ H s++: !g p? !au a w v US+++$ C++$ P+ 3 L E++ N+(!N) K- W M V- po- Y+
     t+ !5 j R G? tv-- b++ !D B- e>* u+(**)@ h--- f+ r++ n+ y+*