Message-Id: <email@example.com> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 1995 09:14:31 -0700 To: firstname.lastname@example.org (Alexander Dupuy) From: email@example.com (Paul Hoffman) Subject: Re: Another round of the mailserver URL Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org >I noticed that the suggestion that clients implementing the mailserver URL put >a header into generated messages indicating the source of the mailserver >URL which generated the message didn't make it into the new draft. This seems >like an extremely useful feature, not just for identifying the culprits in >cases where URLs are used to deliver, but also for mailserver administrators >who may be interested in how people are finding out about them. > >Was there a reason that no such suggestion was made? It was: >The mail client software may do more than this; >for example, the client software might check the configured user ID >using SMTP VRFY before sending a message, or adding other useful >headers such as "Comments" and "Content-id". I guess I could be more explicit with suggestions about what should be in the Comments header.