- From: Jim Conklin <conklin@info.cren.net>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 13:03:04 +0100
- To: Mark Madsen <msm@ansa.co.uk>
- Cc: minutes@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, uri@bunyip.com, msm@ansa.co.uk, urn@mordred.gatech.edu
At 9:44 AM 8/4/95 +0100, Mark Madsen wrote: >Jim Conklin wrote: > ... >> a. WG action on the URN syntax drafts should be moved ahead and >> accomplished by (1) an interim report comparing the various URN >> proposals (based on work already distributed to the WG) and recommending > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > >Would somebody clarify for me whether this refers to the draft I >circulated to the URI list the week before the Stockholm meeting? ... Mark, I believe that's the case, but I confess that my memory is now fuzzy. With the close of the WG, this and all other continuing UR* work will now have to proceed in one of the new UR* WG's resulting from the UR-NG BOF. Jim
Received on Friday, 4 August 1995 13:00:57 UTC