- From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 1994 12:38:06 PST
- To: hoymand@gate.net
- Cc: Michael.Mealling@oit.gatech.edu, uri@bunyip.com
> My understanding is that with sgmls, you could parse SGML into a > canonical form, which could then be handled by something like perl, > tcl, c or what not. Just as HTML doesn't require all browsers to implement all of SGML, but allows SGML-based tools to be used on HTML documents, we could use SGML syntax, but require that a 'URC' be in some canonical form, to facilitate easier handling by simpler tools.
Received on Thursday, 29 December 1994 15:38:40 UTC