W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2017

Re: Editor's notes

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 21:04:43 +0900
Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9E4D9579-0947-445C-8779-E4A617803387@rivoal.net>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>

> On Feb 24, 2017, at 11:46, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
> Let's not forget that sometimes ednotes are NOT issues.  They are things like "Ed. Note: This section was moved from location X to location Y as per the discussion at meeting Z." or "Ed. Note: It is possible that in the future this section will be split out into a separate document for maintenance purposes."  

I don't see how these aren't regular notes. Sure, they're written by the Editor, but given that the Editor is the one who writing the entire document, that's a bit tautological. 

Received on Friday, 24 February 2017 12:05:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:22 UTC