W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > January to March 2017

Re: Editor's notes

From: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:39:56 -0600
Message-ID: <CAJdbnOAKK3EXzaepDRy=KKy8-1Pexh11Jq=YqGGYTwVKLJ6=Pw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
A regular note is typically non normative content that remains in a spec
forever. Ed notes are more ephemeral and generally are ascot the document
and its development rather than advice about the normative content .

On Feb 24, 2017 6:04 AM, "Florian Rivoal" <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:

> > On Feb 24, 2017, at 11:46, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote:
> >
> > Let's not forget that sometimes ednotes are NOT issues.  They are things
> like "Ed. Note: This section was moved from location X to location Y as per
> the discussion at meeting Z." or "Ed. Note: It is possible that in the
> future this section will be split out into a separate document for
> maintenance purposes."
> I don't see how these aren't regular notes. Sure, they're written by the
> Editor, but given that the Editor is the one who writing the entire
> document, that's a bit tautological.
> —Florian
Received on Friday, 24 February 2017 12:40:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:22 UTC