W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: New publication workflow: Echidna 1.2.0, Specberus 1.1.0

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 18:03:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VndqcsBakyuQp3+CWneyF8s+O=wXR3pzBo7sXYC+9hL+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org>, Spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 1 June 2015 at 17:49, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> Shouldn't a Note be the final "final state" for a document? I.e., every
> document is a working draft until it finally becomes a Note/REC/Whatever.
> If so, then your document could be auto published as a working draft - but
> just include some text in the status saying that "this is going to be a W3C
> Note at some point".

that's right, but I think its the boiler plate that needs to be modified to
reflect the note track status.
so maybe need a flag to set the boilerplate to note/rec track?



Current Standards Work @W3C
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 17:04:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:20 UTC