Re: New publication workflow: Echidna 1.2.0, Specberus 1.1.0

On June 1, 2015 at 1:04:21 PM, Steve Faulkner (faulkner.steve@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 1 June 2015 at 17:49, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>  
> > Shouldn't a Note be the final "final state" for a document? I.e., every
> > document is a working draft until it finally becomes a Note/REC/Whatever.
> > If so, then your document could be auto published as a working draft - but
> > just include some text in the status saying that "this is going to be a W3C
> > Note at some point".
>  
>  
> that's right, but I think its the boiler plate that needs to be modified to
> reflect the note track status.
> so maybe need a flag to set the boilerplate to note/rec track?

Ok, is this a ReSpec doc? Can you send me a link? 

Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 17:17:56 UTC