W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2015

Re: New publication workflow: Echidna 1.2.0, Specberus 1.1.0

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:49:40 -0400
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org>
Cc: Spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <etPan.556c8d9d.3c9d1815.276@Zero-privacy.local>

On June 1, 2015 at 6:47:33 AM, Steve Faulkner (faulkner.steve@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi, it's my understanding that the autopublishing system does not currently
> support note track documents. If so is it possible to make it support them?

Shouldn't a Note be the final "final state" for a document? I.e., every document is a working draft until it finally becomes a Note/REC/Whatever. If so, then your document could be auto published as a working draft - but just include some text in the status saying that "this is going to be a W3C Note at some point". 
Received on Monday, 1 June 2015 16:52:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:20 UTC