Re: [restyle] Questionnaire wrt Redesign of the W3C Spec Templates

As a member of the respec team I just want everyone to know we are
completely open to adapting the platform to the needs of the community. The
tail that is respec should not wag the dog.
On Oct 11, 2014 4:03 PM, "Silvia Pfeiffer" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Please make sure that whatever you come up with is included into
> respec and specref - in fact, I'd highly recommend working with the
> authors of those to adapt styles.
>
> Silvia.
>
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > We're looking into redesigning the W3C spec templates and style sheets
> > to reduce boilerplate content and improve usability and readability.
> > To help guide this project, we wanted to collect some information from
> > all the W3C WGs!
> >
> > So please forward this to your WGs; answers are welcome from WGs as a
> > whole and/or individual members, or some combination thereof, however
> > your group prefers to answer. Send them to spec-prod@w3.org [public].
> >
> >   1. Give me 3-5 adjectives for how the visual design of
> >      a W3C spec should "feel".
> >
> >   2. List the URLs to 3 specs that are representative of
> >      your WG's output (especially wrt markup and structure
> >      of the content).
> >
> >   3. Do you have any documentation of your markup conventions?
> >      Please paste URLs:
> >
> >   4. What spec processing tools does your WG actively use?
> >
> >   5. What are your goals for the redesign?
> >
> >   6. Is there anything else we should know / consider?
> >
> >
> > Note: This project is going to be a consensus-driven experiment, so
> > feedback will be welcome throughout. However, it is also a spare-time
> > project, so progress might be a bit slow and sporadic. :)
> >
> > More information at https://www.w3.org/wiki/SpecProd/Restyle
> >
> > Thanks~
> > ~fantasai
> >
>
>