- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 08:02:33 +1100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "chairs@w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
Please make sure that whatever you come up with is included into respec and specref - in fact, I'd highly recommend working with the authors of those to adapt styles. Silvia. On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Hi everyone, > We're looking into redesigning the W3C spec templates and style sheets > to reduce boilerplate content and improve usability and readability. > To help guide this project, we wanted to collect some information from > all the W3C WGs! > > So please forward this to your WGs; answers are welcome from WGs as a > whole and/or individual members, or some combination thereof, however > your group prefers to answer. Send them to spec-prod@w3.org [public]. > > 1. Give me 3-5 adjectives for how the visual design of > a W3C spec should "feel". > > 2. List the URLs to 3 specs that are representative of > your WG's output (especially wrt markup and structure > of the content). > > 3. Do you have any documentation of your markup conventions? > Please paste URLs: > > 4. What spec processing tools does your WG actively use? > > 5. What are your goals for the redesign? > > 6. Is there anything else we should know / consider? > > > Note: This project is going to be a consensus-driven experiment, so > feedback will be welcome throughout. However, it is also a spare-time > project, so progress might be a bit slow and sporadic. :) > > More information at https://www.w3.org/wiki/SpecProd/Restyle > > Thanks~ > ~fantasai >
Received on Saturday, 11 October 2014 21:03:21 UTC