W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: problem with Previous version

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:50:24 +0100
Message-ID: <53A209A0.5040400@vu.nl>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "team-rdf-chairs@w3.org" <team-rdf-chairs@w3.org>


On 18-06-14 22:16, Shane McCarron wrote:
> On a related note - I see that with their spec at
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-primer/index.html there
> is a Previous Recommendation header.  That doesn't seem right, does it?
>   This is a note.  What sort of header should be included when there is
> a previously published Note and a previous draft of the new version?

Actually, the 2004 version of thid document was part of the REC package 
at the time. The current WG decided to publish the revised version as 
Note, so it makes sense in fact.

Guus

>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com
> <mailto:w3c@marcosc.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On June 18, 2014 at 4:57:53 PM, Shane McCarron (shane@aptest.com
>     <mailto:shane@aptest.com>) wrote:
>      > Okay - let's just fix ReSpec to do it right. I know the line of
>     code to
>      > change. I will see about creating a pull request.
>
>     \0/! If you need a PR review, just ping.
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 21:50:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:19 UTC