W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: problem with Previous version

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:00:36 +0100
Message-ID: <53A1EFE4.10901@vu.nl>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, "team-rdf-chairs@w3.org" <team-rdf-chairs@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>

On 18-06-14 20:56, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Well...  I don't disagree but shouldn't we just fix it?  There is no
> reason for a note to not have a previous version as far as I know.

I don't really care either way (slight pref for prior version present); 
the main problem is that pubrules says it should have. Thaht conflict 
requires fixing, I think.

Thanks for the help,

> On Jun 18, 2014 2:51 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com
> <mailto:w3c@marcosc.com>> wrote:
>     On June 18, 2014 at 3:30:53 PM, Shane McCarron (shane@aptest.com
>     <mailto:shane@aptest.com>) wrote:
>      > The reason the previous version is not showing up is that
>     document has a
>      > spec status of WG-NOTE. The logic in respec says that if it is a
>     NOTE then
>      > do not show the previous version. I don't know why. Robin?
>     I think this has now come up on this list enough time that we should
>     consolidate or kill one of them. It's an endless source of
>     confusion. No one's fault, obviously! but we should really address
>     this.
>     --
>     Marcos Caceres
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:01:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:19 UTC