Re: problem with Previous version

Okay - let's just fix ReSpec to do it right.  I know the line of code to
change.  I will see about creating a pull request.


On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

>
> On Jun 18, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
>
> > Well...  I don't disagree but shouldn't we just fix it?  There is no
> reason for a note to not have a previous version as far as I know.
>
> Notes can be updated (and thus have previous version links).
>
> Ian
>
> >
> > On Jun 18, 2014 2:51 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On June 18, 2014 at 3:30:53 PM, Shane McCarron (shane@aptest.com) wrote:
> > > The reason the previous version is not showing up is that document has
> a
> > > spec status of WG-NOTE. The logic in respec says that if it is a NOTE
> then
> > > do not show the previous version. I don't know why. Robin?
> >
> > I think this has now come up on this list enough time that we should
> consolidate or kill one of them. It's an endless source of confusion. No
> one's fault, obviously! but we should really address this.
> >
> > --
> > Marcos Caceres
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>
>