- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:00:51 -0500
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Frederick Hirsch <w3c@fjhirsch.com>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, "team-rdf-chairs@w3.org" <team-rdf-chairs@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Jun 18, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > Well... I don't disagree but shouldn't we just fix it? There is no reason for a note to not have a previous version as far as I know. Notes can be updated (and thus have previous version links). Ian > > On Jun 18, 2014 2:51 PM, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > > > > On June 18, 2014 at 3:30:53 PM, Shane McCarron (shane@aptest.com) wrote: > > The reason the previous version is not showing up is that document has a > > spec status of WG-NOTE. The logic in respec says that if it is a NOTE then > > do not show the previous version. I don't know why. Robin? > > I think this has now come up on this list enough time that we should consolidate or kill one of them. It's an endless source of confusion. No one's fault, obviously! but we should really address this. > > -- > Marcos Caceres -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2014 20:01:00 UTC