- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:28:23 -0500
- To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: <spec-prod@w3.org>, "'Simon Sapin'" <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
On Oct 28, 2013, at 9:24 AM, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote: > On Monday, October 28, 2013 3:11 PM, Simon Sapin wrote: >> Le 28/10/2013 13:50, Ian Jacobs a écrit : >>>>> We have that today for all specs. Click on the date on the TR page. >> Example: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/standards/history/css-cascade-3 >>>> >>>> That page shows "Retired" at the bottom. What does that mean? I >>>> can't imagine a spec that went to CR on 2013-10-03 to be retired >>>> already. >>> Retired means "The group told us they don't intend to pursue it but >>> are not yet ready to publish an end Note." >> >> This may be off topic, but I’m not aware of this being the case for >> css-cascade. The spec is in CR with no known open issue, and >> implementations are being worked on. > > I think this is just a usability issue. "RETIRED" on that page is a header > for a list of retired specifications. On the page cited above, there are no > such specifications. Have a look at, e.g., > > http://www.w3.org/standards/history/svgprint > > to see how it is supposed to look like. The retired header should probably > be hidden if there are no retired documents. Yep, sounds like a bug. I've let the systems team know. Thanks! Ian > > You can get a list of all retired docs at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-all#tr_Retired > > > Cheers, > Markus > > > -- > Markus Lanthaler > @markuslanthaler > > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 14:28:30 UTC