Re: YA proposal to bring /TR/ into the 21st century

On Oct 28, 2013, at 9:24 AM, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Monday, October 28, 2013 3:11 PM, Simon Sapin wrote:
>> Le 28/10/2013 13:50, Ian Jacobs a écrit :
>>>>> We have that today for all specs. Click on the date on the TR page.
>> Example:
>>>>>  http://www.w3.org/standards/history/css-cascade-3
>>>> 
>>>> That page shows "Retired" at the bottom. What does that mean? I
>>>> can't imagine a spec that went to CR on 2013-10-03 to be retired
>>>> already.
>>> Retired means "The group told us they don't intend to pursue it but
>>> are not yet ready to publish an end Note."
>> 
>> This may be off topic, but I’m not aware of this being the case for
>> css-cascade. The spec is in CR with no known open issue, and
>> implementations are being worked on.
> 
> I think this is just a usability issue. "RETIRED" on that page is a header
> for a list of retired specifications. On the page cited above, there are no
> such specifications. Have a look at, e.g.,
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/standards/history/svgprint
> 
> to see how it is supposed to look like. The retired header should probably
> be hidden if there are no retired documents.

Yep, sounds like a bug. I've let the systems team know.

Thanks!

Ian

> 
> You can get a list of all retired docs at
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-all#tr_Retired
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Markus
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                                          +1 718 260 9447

Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 14:28:30 UTC