- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:24:12 +0100
- To: <spec-prod@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Ian Jacobs'" <ij@w3.org>, "'Simon Sapin'" <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
On Monday, October 28, 2013 3:11 PM, Simon Sapin wrote: > Le 28/10/2013 13:50, Ian Jacobs a écrit : > >>> We have that today for all specs. Click on the date on the TR page. > Example: > >>> http://www.w3.org/standards/history/css-cascade-3 > >> > >> That page shows "Retired" at the bottom. What does that mean? I > >> can't imagine a spec that went to CR on 2013-10-03 to be retired > >> already. > > Retired means "The group told us they don't intend to pursue it but > > are not yet ready to publish an end Note." > > This may be off topic, but I’m not aware of this being the case for > css-cascade. The spec is in CR with no known open issue, and > implementations are being worked on. I think this is just a usability issue. "RETIRED" on that page is a header for a list of retired specifications. On the page cited above, there are no such specifications. Have a look at, e.g., http://www.w3.org/standards/history/svgprint to see how it is supposed to look like. The retired header should probably be hidden if there are no retired documents. You can get a list of all retired docs at http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-all#tr_Retired Cheers, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 14:24:42 UTC