W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: YA proposal to bring /TR/ into the 21st century

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:16:04 -0500
Cc: "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>, ext Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3BE690BE-9788-4C77-B93B-D9621BAB242B@w3.org>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>, "bbos@w3.org" <bbos@w3.org>, "clilley@w3.org" <clilley@w3.org>

On Oct 28, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote:

> Le 28/10/2013 13:50, Ian Jacobs a écrit :
>>>> We have that today for all specs. Click on the date on the TR page. Example:
>>>>  http://www.w3.org/standards/history/css-cascade-3
>>> That page shows "Retired" at the bottom. What does that mean? I
>>> can't imagine a spec that went to CR on 2013-10-03 to be retired
>>> already.
>> Retired means "The group told us they don't intend to pursue it but
>> are not yet ready to publish an end Note."
> This may be off topic, but I’m not aware of this being the case for css-cascade. The spec is in CR with no known open issue, and implementations are being worked on.

Thanks, Simon.

I'm roping in Chris Lilley and Bert Bos to shed light on this, as well as the webmaster.

If the specification is incorrectly labeled, please send a webreq to correct it. thanks!

Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                                          +1 718 260 9447
Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 14:16:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 28 October 2013 14:16:11 UTC