Re: YA proposal to bring /TR/ into the 21st century

On 2013/10/22 3:02, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Shane McCarron<ahby@aptest.com>  wrote:
>
>> Hmm.  I think it is important that TR/short-name/ continue to work as it has.  The industry knows this is where you go to find specs, and I wouldn't want to have to *decide* which one to read.  On the other hand, I think a convention that was TR/short-name/menu or list or something would be great!   A standardized way to get to the list of all versions of a spec
>
> We have that today for all specs. Click on the date on the TR page. Example:
>   http://www.w3.org/standards/history/css-cascade-3

That page shows "Retired" at the bottom. What does that mean? I can't 
imagine a spec that went to CR on 2013-10-03 to be retired already.

Regards,   Martin.

Received on Monday, 28 October 2013 05:26:16 UTC