W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Some thoughts on a new publication approach

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:00:47 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=dZeUhtgHJca40f+r=LQYHzZh3iBeqW1HavdTPWC2-qg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Cc: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:
> On 21/10/2013 18:01 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
>>
>> Le lundi 21 octobre 2013 à 16:26 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit :
>>>
>>> I'm not saying that we can switch TR over to such a system overnight,
>>> but the plan is both PP-friendly and strikes me as reasonably simple to
>>> implement.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Sounds very good to me too. I think there are probably a small number of
>> pubrules we would want to keep in the way of the TR branch (e.g. some PP
>> boilerplate, or easy access to sending feedback?).
>
>
> Yes, you are correct that some minimal rules would need to be enforced. But
> I think that the number can be very small.
>
>
>> In that case, maybe the auto-publish mechanism would not replace to the
>> latest version until these fixes are in?
>
>
> Yes. It complicates the implementation somewhat, but not terribly. If you
> remember the last good commit, you can always reset to it.
>
>
>> But that's probably one of the many details that would need to be looked
>> into; but the general approach seems right to me.
>
>
> Since feedback seems to be positive, I'll try to find some time to code up a
> prototype around TPAC.

SGTM - happy to discuss further at TPAC.

Silvia.
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 22:01:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 21 October 2013 22:01:36 UTC