- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:00:47 +1100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:04 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 21/10/2013 18:01 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: >> >> Le lundi 21 octobre 2013 à 16:26 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit : >>> >>> I'm not saying that we can switch TR over to such a system overnight, >>> but the plan is both PP-friendly and strikes me as reasonably simple to >>> implement. >>> >>> Any thoughts? >> >> >> Sounds very good to me too. I think there are probably a small number of >> pubrules we would want to keep in the way of the TR branch (e.g. some PP >> boilerplate, or easy access to sending feedback?). > > > Yes, you are correct that some minimal rules would need to be enforced. But > I think that the number can be very small. > > >> In that case, maybe the auto-publish mechanism would not replace to the >> latest version until these fixes are in? > > > Yes. It complicates the implementation somewhat, but not terribly. If you > remember the last good commit, you can always reset to it. > > >> But that's probably one of the many details that would need to be looked >> into; but the general approach seems right to me. > > > Since feedback seems to be positive, I'll try to find some time to code up a > prototype around TPAC. SGTM - happy to discuss further at TPAC. Silvia.
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 22:01:35 UTC