W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Some thoughts on a new publication approach

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:04:05 +0200
Message-ID: <52657AA5.6000500@w3.org>
To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
CC: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 21/10/2013 18:01 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Le lundi 21 octobre 2013 à 16:26 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit :
>> I'm not saying that we can switch TR over to such a system overnight,
>> but the plan is both PP-friendly and strikes me as reasonably simple to
>> implement.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Sounds very good to me too. I think there are probably a small number of
> pubrules we would want to keep in the way of the TR branch (e.g. some PP
> boilerplate, or easy access to sending feedback?).

Yes, you are correct that some minimal rules would need to be enforced. 
But I think that the number can be very small.

> In that case, maybe the auto-publish mechanism would not replace to the
> latest version until these fixes are in?

Yes. It complicates the implementation somewhat, but not terribly. If 
you remember the last good commit, you can always reset to it.

> But that's probably one of the many details that would need to be looked
> into; but the general approach seems right to me.

Since feedback seems to be positive, I'll try to find some time to code 
up a prototype around TPAC.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 19:04:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 21 October 2013 19:04:17 UTC