- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:04:05 +0200
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- CC: "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 21/10/2013 18:01 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le lundi 21 octobre 2013 à 16:26 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit : >> I'm not saying that we can switch TR over to such a system overnight, >> but the plan is both PP-friendly and strikes me as reasonably simple to >> implement. >> >> Any thoughts? > > Sounds very good to me too. I think there are probably a small number of > pubrules we would want to keep in the way of the TR branch (e.g. some PP > boilerplate, or easy access to sending feedback?). Yes, you are correct that some minimal rules would need to be enforced. But I think that the number can be very small. > In that case, maybe the auto-publish mechanism would not replace to the > latest version until these fixes are in? Yes. It complicates the implementation somewhat, but not terribly. If you remember the last good commit, you can always reset to it. > But that's probably one of the many details that would need to be looked > into; but the general approach seems right to me. Since feedback seems to be positive, I'll try to find some time to code up a prototype around TPAC. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 19:04:17 UTC