W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Nightly drafts on /TR

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:25:53 +0100
Message-ID: <525D6C91.6020406@w3.org>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>
CC: Jérémie Astori <jeremie@w3.org>, Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Couple of notes:

If I look for nightlies under i18n in
http://www.w3.org/2013/08/wd-tr/TR-editors.html
I see Predefined Counter Styles.

If I look under
http://www.w3.org/2013/08/wd-tr/TR-all.html
I see Requirements for Hangul Text Layout and Typography

I don't see both in both places.

Also, under 
http://www.w3.org/2013/08/wd-tr/TR-editors.html#tr_Internationalization_of_Web_Design_and_Applications 
there's no link to 'Working Draft', but the title of the doc points to 
the WD, which is a little confusing.

RI



On 30/08/2013 16:03, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> All,
>
> A few of us spent some cycles this week to figure out how to include
> editor's drafts in the /TR page, following [1, 2].
>
> At this point, if your published TR draft contained a link to the
> "Latest editor's draft", such as [3], the TR database knows about it. It
> know about 147 editor's drafts at this time. We're looking for the
> keywords "editor" and "draft" in the beginning of your spec so this
> should handle all the variants. If you don't want it to appear on
> the /TR page, then don't include it in your TR draft, or avoid the
> keywords (but, in that case, I would question why it's ok to put the
> link in the document but not on /TR itself).
>
> It's only a small step forward, ie this is not a major redesign of
> the /TR page, nor do we make a copy of the editor's drafts on the W3C
> web site at this point. The majority of the EDs are already hosted by
> W3C (www, dev, dvcs, or w3c-test.org).
>
> We picked the term "nightly draft" instead of "editor's draft" since
> developers will be more familiar with the meaning. At this time, we
> didn't put a disclaimer regarding the status of the nightly drafts.
>
> Here is the static default view for TR with all the editors we know
> about:
> http://www.w3.org/2013/08/wd-tr/TR-all.html
>
> This is going to be the future "Nightly drafts only" view: (this one
> doesn't have all of the ED drafts yet)
> http://www.w3.org/2013/08/wd-tr/TR-editors.html
>
> Note the UI difference between the two when one selects "Nightly drafts
> only" in the selection form at the beginning (one disable some of the
> options in sort criteria, while the other remove them). Let me know
> which UI you prefer.
>
> I don't know when this is going to go into production at this time and
> we didn't write all the necessary code for it yet, but we'd like to
> deploy sooner rather than later.
>
> After that, the systeam will work on the API to expose the data to the
> outside but no ETA on this yet either.
>
> Feedback is welcome of course.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Philippe
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013AprJun/0024.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013AprJun/0072.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2dcontext/
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 October 2013 16:26:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 15 October 2013 16:26:23 UTC