- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:30:28 +0100
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
On Monday, June 24, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Alexandre Bertails wrote: > On 06/22/2013 09:05 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > Again, it would be amazing if we could put Editor's drafts on /TR/. The only things that Editor's drafts would need to include is: > > > If you could publish EDs on /TR, what would be the difference with a WD > that you could publish everyday? None. > What about WG endorsement? > A WG would agree to this work mode upfront (other WG's may opt for the "classic" publication mode). The WG would endorse the significant milestones (e.g., LC, CR) at the appropriate moment in time.
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 11:30:59 UTC