- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:24:00 -0400
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
On 06/22/2013 09:05 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > On Saturday, 22 June 2013 at 09:51, Dave Raggett wrote: >> Hi Philippe, >> >> In regard to the new publishing process could you please clarify what >> you meant by: >> >>> One of the information that I'm interested in exposing is the links >>> to editor's drafts, which will allow us to generate a version of /TR >>> with them. We'll get the links directly from the documents so, again, >>> no additional step needed from the editors. >> > >> see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013AprJun/0024.html >> >> Does this mean that editor's drafts will now be copied /TR, or is it >> more about just adding links from regular WDs to the latest editor's draft? > > Again, it would be amazing if we could put Editor's drafts on /TR/. The only things that Editor's drafts would need to include is: If you could publish EDs on /TR, what would be the difference with a WD that you could publish everyday? What about WG endorsement? Alexandre. > > 1. links to IPR relevant versions for the lawyers, including FPWD and any Lawyer Call (LC) and any Rec. > 2. Make sure that quality is maintained (PubRules must pass, including copyright, disclosure links, valid markup, valid CSS, no broken links, etc., etc.) > > It could be a kind of continuous integration thing … or a two click "check my spec!" -> If all good? "Click here to put it on TR!". > > > -- > Marcos Caceres > > > > >
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 11:24:02 UTC