W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Editor's drafts on /TR/… ftw, was Re: new TR tools and editor's drafts?

From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:24:00 -0400
Message-ID: <51C82C50.3080307@w3.org>
To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
CC: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
On 06/22/2013 09:05 AM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, 22 June 2013 at 09:51, Dave Raggett wrote:
>> Hi Philippe,
>>
>> In regard to the new publishing process could you please clarify what
>> you meant by:
>>
>>> One of the information that I'm interested in exposing is the links
>>> to editor's drafts, which will allow us to generate a version of /TR
>>> with them. We'll get the links directly from the documents so, again,
>>> no additional step needed from the editors.
>>
>
>> see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013AprJun/0024.html
>>
>> Does this mean that editor's drafts will now be copied /TR, or is it
>> more about just adding links from regular WDs to the latest editor's draft?
>
> Again, it would be amazing if we could put Editor's drafts on /TR/. The only things that Editor's drafts would need to include is:

If you could publish EDs on /TR, what would be the difference with a WD 
that you could publish everyday? What about WG endorsement?

Alexandre.

>
> 1. links to IPR relevant versions for the lawyers, including FPWD and any Lawyer Call (LC) and any Rec.
> 2. Make sure that quality is maintained (PubRules must pass, including copyright, disclosure links, valid markup, valid CSS, no broken links, etc., etc.)
>
> It could be a kind of continuous integration thing … or a two click "check my spec!" -> If all good? "Click here to put it on TR!".
>
>
> --
> Marcos Caceres
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 24 June 2013 11:24:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC