- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 14:05:44 +0100
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: spec-prod <spec-prod@w3.org>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
On Saturday, 22 June 2013 at 09:51, Dave Raggett wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > In regard to the new publishing process could you please clarify what > you meant by: > > > One of the information that I'm interested in exposing is the links > > to editor's drafts, which will allow us to generate a version of /TR > > with them. We'll get the links directly from the documents so, again, > > no additional step needed from the editors. > > see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013AprJun/0024.html > > Does this mean that editor's drafts will now be copied /TR, or is it > more about just adding links from regular WDs to the latest editor's draft? Again, it would be amazing if we could put Editor's drafts on /TR/. The only things that Editor's drafts would need to include is: 1. links to IPR relevant versions for the lawyers, including FPWD and any Lawyer Call (LC) and any Rec. 2. Make sure that quality is maintained (PubRules must pass, including copyright, disclosure links, valid markup, valid CSS, no broken links, etc., etc.) It could be a kind of continuous integration thing … or a two click "check my spec!" -> If all good? "Click here to put it on TR!". -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Saturday, 22 June 2013 13:06:07 UTC