W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Using the W3C publication process vocabulary

From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 08:48:13 -0400
Message-ID: <51C6EE8D.7040804@w3.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: shane@aptest.com, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 06/23/2013 07:27 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> The RDF file that are used internally usually use the 'rec' prefix for this one.
> But, well, *shrug*, that is not a strong argument...

Why not "tr:" then?


> Ivan
> Shane McCarron wrote:
>> In order to enhance the RDFa support in ReSpec, I am going to include an
>> indication of the specification status using the vocabulary
>> at http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54 - see http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.n3
>> if you want to view one version.
>> My plan is to use the prefix 'w3p' for this unless there is an existing commonly
>> used prefix for this vocabulary.  If anyone has an opinion on this, please don't
>> hesitate to chime in.
>> --
>> Shane P. McCarron
>> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 12:48:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC