Re: Using the W3C publication process vocabulary

The RDF file that are used internally usually use the 'rec' prefix for this one.
But, well, *shrug*, that is not a strong argument...

Ivan

Shane McCarron wrote:
> In order to enhance the RDFa support in ReSpec, I am going to include an
> indication of the specification status using the vocabulary
> at http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54 - see http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.n3
> if you want to view one version.
> 
> My plan is to use the prefix 'w3p' for this unless there is an existing commonly
> used prefix for this vocabulary.  If anyone has an opinion on this, please don't
> hesitate to chime in.
> 
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.

-- 
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me