W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > spec-prod@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Using the W3C publication process vocabulary

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:49:23 +0200
Message-ID: <51C6EED3.70600@w3.org>
To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
CC: shane@aptest.com, W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, "spec-prod@w3.org Prod" <spec-prod@w3.org>


Alexandre Bertails wrote:
> On 06/23/2013 07:27 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> The RDF file that are used internally usually use the 'rec' prefix for this one.
>> But, well, *shrug*, that is not a strong argument...
> 
> Why not "tr:" then?

Works for me, too.

Ivan

> 
> Alexandre.
> 
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>> Shane McCarron wrote:
>>> In order to enhance the RDFa support in ReSpec, I am going to include an
>>> indication of the specification status using the vocabulary
>>> at http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54 - see http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54.n3
>>> if you want to view one version.
>>>
>>> My plan is to use the prefix 'w3p' for this unless there is an existing commonly
>>> used prefix for this vocabulary.  If anyone has an opinion on this, please don't
>>> hesitate to chime in.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Shane P. McCarron
>>> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf#me

Received on Sunday, 23 June 2013 12:50:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:18 UTC