- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:24:06 +0100
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>, Berjon Robin <robin.berjon@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On Friday, June 21, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Richard Ishida wrote: > On 21/06/2013 15:07, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > Wonder if we should redirect the old respec version? > > > > It would certainly save time looking things up. Btw, googling respec to > find the latest version brought me to https://github.com/darobin/respec, > which informed me, in the section What is this version of ReSpec?, that > I was two versions out of date, but I couldn't find a simple link to > replace the old one with. Presumably the link you sent me is the same > one as ReSpec:Evolution that I'm reading about there? Might be worth > adding a brief clarification. Yeah, it's a struggle to keep the documentation up to date of this important resource :( A bunch of us are trying to get organized to do a document sprint to update the documentation but it's hard. > Sorry, I'm not following the development of respec in any detail, just > using it under pressure to create documents more quickly. In some ways > my questions are probably tedious for you, but in others maybe it's > useful, since I guess I'm raising issues that others like me may have. Totally not tedious! It's exactly the kind of feedback we need - people yelling "fix it!" is a good thing. > Btw, changing the link allowed me to dismiss the error msgs. (It did, > however, break some other bits of my document.) > Ain't technology great? :) -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 14:24:43 UTC