- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:17:55 +0100
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- CC: Tobie Langel <tobie@w3.org>, Berjon Robin <robin.berjon@gmail.com>, "spec-prod@w3.org" <spec-prod@w3.org>
On 21/06/2013 15:07, Marcos Caceres wrote: > Wonder if we should redirect the old respec version? It would certainly save time looking things up. Btw, googling respec to find the latest version brought me to https://github.com/darobin/respec, which informed me, in the section What is this version of ReSpec?, that I was two versions out of date, but I couldn't find a simple link to replace the old one with. Presumably the link you sent me is the same one as ReSpec:Evolution that I'm reading about there? Might be worth adding a brief clarification. Sorry, I'm not following the development of respec in any detail, just using it under pressure to create documents more quickly. In some ways my questions are probably tedious for you, but in others maybe it's useful, since I guess I'm raising issues that others like me may have. Btw, changing the link allowed me to dismiss the error msgs. (It did, however, break some other bits of my document.) RI -- Richard Ishida, W3C http://rishida.net/
Received on Friday, 21 June 2013 14:18:25 UTC