- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:55:46 +0100
- To: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- CC: spec-prod@w3.org
I guess that what threw me initially was the specStatus name FPWD-NOTE, which I think should be just FP-NOTE or some such - since a NOTE that is published straight away isn't a WD. I read it as FPWD intended to eventually become a NOTE. Wrong! It would be helpful to add a note (small n) to http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/documentation.html#saving-the-generated-specification to clarify this. It currently says (my emphasis): "Some of the header notably depends on whether the specification is on "Rec-track", *which is the case if* the specStatus is one of: "FPWD", "WD", "LC", "CR", "PR", "PER", or "REC"." which gives the impression that FPWD what you pick for docs intended for the Rec track, and doesn't hint to you that you can actually have a FPWD but still set noRecTrack to true. Presumably that same applies to WD, if you take a few iterations before NOTE publication. RI On 07/05/2013 15:44, Robin Berjon wrote: > On 07/05/2013 16:41 , Richard Ishida wrote: >> This goes away if you select FPWD rather than FPWD-NOTE, and set >> noRecTrack to true. > > Yes, that happens to be the way to publish a first public Note. You have > to not make it a Note. Don't blame ReSpec for that :) > -- Richard Ishida, W3C http://rishida.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 14:56:16 UTC