- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 15:22:51 +0100
- To: spec-prod@w3.org
Scratch [4]. Looks like you need to choose FPWD, rather than FPWD-NOTE, and set noRecTrack to true. I'd recommend changing FPWD-NOTE to FPNOTE to make things clearer, if that is really what is intended. RI On 07/05/2013 14:41, Richard Ishida wrote: > [sending here for the sake of completeness] > > [4] the This Version link that is generated is > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/NOTE-klreq-20130514/ > > it should be > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-klreq-20130514/ > > since this is just a FPWD. > > RI > > > On 07/05/2013 13:14, Richard Ishida wrote: >> [3] It produces a "Previous version:" subhead, though no pointer. This >> shouldn't be there for a FPWD. >> >> RI >> >> >> On 07/05/2013 13:05, Richard Ishida wrote: >>> Annoyingly I have to keep fixing a couple of bugs while trying to >>> publish a FPWD of a document intended to become a WG NOTE. Where should >>> I report them? >>> >>> I'll report here for the time being. Spec status was set to FPWD-NOTE. >>> >>> [1] Status boilerplate: >>> >>> "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group >>> as a First Public Working Group Note" >>> >>> is ambiguous. I think respec should generate: >>> >>> "This document was published by the Internationalization Working Group >>> as a First Public Working Draft. The group intends to publish this >>> document as a Working Group Note" >>> >>> >>> [2] Pubrules gives the following error: >>> >>> "Error. The W3C style sheet should be >>> http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. It is currently >>> //www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-WG-NOTE. " >>> >>> >>> RI >>> >>> >> >> > > -- Richard Ishida, W3C http://rishida.net/
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 14:23:24 UTC