spec-prod@w3.org from April to June 2002 by author

Alex Rousskov

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

Alexander Savenkov

• Various Spec Formats (Sunday, 5 May)

Ben Trafford

• Re: Copyright Status's of spec-prod documents (Friday, 14 June)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Various Spec Formats (Sunday, 5 May)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

Christopher R. Maden

• Re: Copyright Status's of spec-prod documents (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Copyright Status's of spec-prod documents (Monday, 17 June)

cristy154@hotmail.com

• Make Big Money with eBay and . . . 30415 (Saturday, 22 June)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Doc for XMLspec - Validity (Friday, 7 June)
• W3C style for dates: 2002-05-06 or 6 May, not 5/6 nor 6/5 (Wednesday, 22 May)
• Re: Comments on Manual of Style (how to find it) (Tuesday, 30 April)

Daniel Dardailler

• Comments on Manual of Style (Tuesday, 30 April)

David Marston/Cambridge/IBM

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Tuesday, 7 May)

Dimitris Dimitriadis

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 27 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Friday, 10 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

Don Brutzman

• got spy? (Thursday, 9 May)

Eve L. Maler

• Re: Doc for XMLspec - Validity (Tuesday, 11 June)

ezgo@w3.org

• 超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 PCib1KvdudFGTwlxw5Zj (Sunday, 16 June)

George Soros

• Net-sponsor.com (Saturday, 29 June)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: Copyright Status's of spec-prod documents (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: xmlspec.xsl needs to change (Wednesday, 5 June)

Horny Fantasies

• **Hot Horny Models Want to Fulfill Your Fantasies!!** ghuly (Monday, 24 June)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Re: Comments on Manual of Style (Tuesday, 30 April)

Jonathan Robie

• RE: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

Joseph Reagle

• Re: Copyright Status's of spec-prod documents (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Copyright Status's of spec-prod documents (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Copyright Status's of spec-prod documents (Friday, 14 June)

Karl Dubost

• Doc for XMLspec - Validity (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

kk@w3.org

• ＊。。連鎖超商邀你加盟。。＊ (Thursday, 27 June)

Lofton Henderson

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Friday, 24 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

Mary Brady

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Tuesday, 7 May)

Micah Dubinko

• The presentation of this document has been augmented... (Wednesday, 3 April)

Norman Walsh

• Re: Copyright Status's of spec-prod documents (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: Doc for XMLspec - Validity (Friday, 7 June)
• Re: The presentation of this document has been augmented... (Tuesday, 16 April)

Paul Cotton

• RE: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Tuesday, 7 May)

Philip Wadler

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• xmlspec.xsl needs to change (Monday, 3 June)

reagle

• 4/27/2002 3:49:17 PM (Saturday, 27 April)
• reagle , Your first targeted e-mailing is FREE (Sunday, 14 April)
• reagle , Your first targeted e-mailing is FREE (Tuesday, 2 April)

scott_boag@us.ibm.com

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Tuesday, 28 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Friday, 10 May)
• RE: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Tuesday, 7 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)
• Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

Stefan Schumacher

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Monday, 6 May)

Susan Lesch

• Re: W3C style for dates: 2002-05-06 or 6 May, not 5/6 nor 6/5 (Friday, 24 May)

Tim Bray

• Re: Testable assertion tagging for W3C specifications (Thursday, 9 May)

Yameen Zubairi

• mailing list problem (Friday, 10 May)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 June 2002 01:22:26 UTC