- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 07:17:54 -0700
- To: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@arbortext.com>
- Cc: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@arbortext.com>, spec-prod@w3.org, elm@arbortext.com
At 10:03 AM 5/15/98 -0400, Eve L. Maler wrote: >Actually, I was thinking that I should just add a generic "constraint" (and >"constraint note") and then you could use the role attribute to say the >type. I think I will add this; if you wish, you can then change your >namespace constraint elements over to this. Good idea. And adds a bit of future-proofing. >Now that the DTD is parameterized, it is relatively reasonable to have >"different" DTDs for different specs -- each can have a small customization >layer that meets its needs. Well, for the record, this is a relatively small family of docs, and I think it'd be worth the effort to stay with a single DTD until there's a really good reason to split. But you're the expert in this area. -Tim
Received on Friday, 15 May 1998 10:19:10 UTC