- From: Ilkka Huotari <ihuotari@cc.hut.fi>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 15:43:42 +0300
- To: "Janet Daly" <janet@w3.org>
- Cc: <site-policy@w3.org>, <site-comments@w3.org>
Just for your information; There is a CHM of HTML 4.01 here too... http://html.conclase.net/w3c/html401-es/cover.html http://html.conclase.net/w3c/html401-es/html401-es.chm It's not mine, but I just noticed that some other people have had the same idea of CHMs of the specs. (And ... I would be interested to work on such a format if you would be interested on co-operation). Regards, Ilkka ----- Original Message ----- From: "Janet Daly" <janet@w3.org> To: "Ilkka Huotari" <ihuotari@cc.hut.fi> Cc: <site-policy@w3.org>; <site-comments@w3.org> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:51 PM Subject: Re: W3C specs reformatted > > > Ilkka Huotari wrote: > > > Ok, I see that this URL > > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/IPR-FAQ-20000620#format > > talks actually about the same thing - if the content is changed then the > > republishing cannot be granted, but if the content stays the same, then > > publishing is generally granted. > > No, Ilkka, what the Document license, which applies in this case, says is: > > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231 > > > And what it says is: > > No right to create modifications or derivatives of W3C documents is > granted pursuant to this license. > > Adding additional stylesheets is a modification. It changes the bits in > the document. > > > I will change the stylesheet today, and see that everything complies to the > > license. > > > > So, I guess we can consider this conversation as the notification of those > > reformatted specs - I assume the knowledge of them ahs spread wide enough > > and there wouldn't be any badwill from the publishing - as log as I change > > the specs to comply the standards. > > Please see above. If you modify them, you are not in compliance with the > Document License. It's more than copyright that applies. > > > Sorry if this was confusing, but it wasn't clear to alt.html folks either - > > there were opinions that a permission should be asked if reformatted specs > > are distributed, so I decided to do so. > > I read the thread. It would have been better to ask first. > > > Ilkka > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Janet Daly" <janet@w3.org> > > To: "Ilkka Huotari" <ihuotari@cc.hut.fi> > > Cc: <site-policy@w3.org>; <site-comments@w3.org> > > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 8:55 PM > > Subject: Re: W3C specs reformatted > > > > > > > >> > >>Ilkka Huotari wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>Thanks for the answer. > >>> > >>>Could they be published if I change the stylesheets to comply to your > >>>standards? > >> > >>>There isn't any major reason to why I have changed the stylesheets - I > >>>didn't know about those rules originally. So I could very easily change > > > > the > > > >>>stylesheets to the same what you have (they could be exactly the same, I > >>>think). > >> > >>Ilkka, it may help for you to read the document license. Everything I am > >>telling you comes from there: > >> > >>http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231 > >> > >> > >>"Permission to copy, and distribute the contents of this document, or > >>the W3C document from which this statement is linked, in any medium for > >>any purpose and without fee or royalty is hereby granted, provided that > >>you include the following on ALL copies of the document, or portions > >>thereof, that you use: > >> > >> 1. A link or URL to the original W3C document. > >> 2. The pre-existing copyright notice of the original author, or if > >>it doesn't exist, a notice (hypertext is preferred, but a textual > >>representation is permitted) of the form: "Copyright © > >>[$date-of-document] World Wide Web Consortium, (Massachusetts Institute > >>of Technology, European Research Consortium for Informatics and > >>Mathematics, Keio University). All Rights Reserved. > >>http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231" > >> 3. If it exists, the STATUS of the W3C document. > >> > >>When space permits, inclusion of the full text of this NOTICE should be > >>provided. We request that authorship attribution be provided in any > >>software, documents, or other items or products that you create pursuant > >>to the implementation of the contents of this document, or any portion > >>thereof." > >> > >>This is the policy for just making a copy with no modifications. > >> > >>So, if you were reposting the documents as is on your site, these are > >>the rules you have to follow. > >> > >> > >>>So... if this could help it? > >>> > >> > >> > > >> > >>>Thanks, > >>>Ilkka > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>From: "Janet Daly" <janet@w3.org> > >>>To: "Ilkka Huotari" <ihuotari@cc.hut.fi> > >>>Cc: <site-policy@w3.org>; <site-comments@w3.org> > >>>Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 8:18 PM > >>>Subject: Re: W3C specs reformatted > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Dear Ilkka, > >>>> > >>>>Thank you for your request. Susan Lesch of the W3C Communications team > >>>>provided an earlier response, on the site-comments mailing list: > >>>> > >>>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/site-comments/2004May/0051.html > >>>> > >>>>But what remains is whether what you are proposing to do complies with > >>>>the Document License at W3C: > >>>> > >>>>http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231 > >>>> > >>>>No right to create modifications or derivatives of W3C documents is > >>>>granted pursuant to this license. So, changing the stylesheets and > >>>>republishing them is not permitted. > >>>> > >>>>I appreciate your caution and request, but inform you that it is not > >>>>possible for these to be published. > >>>> > >>>>Best regards, > >>>> > >>>>Janet > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > >>>> > >>>>Janet Daly, Head of Communications > >>>>MIT/CSAIL, Building 32-G518 > >>>>32 Vassar Street > >>>>Cambridge, MA 02139 > >>>> > >>>>voice: 617.253.5884 > >>>>fax: 617.258.5999 > >>>>http://www.w3.org/ > >>>>janet@w3.org > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Ilkka Huotari wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>>This email concerns the reformatted W3C specs that I made. Only this > >>> > >>>late I > >>> > >>> > >>>>>am asking you for the permission to do/distribute those versions: > >>>>> > >>>>>You may (or may not) have seen that I made some reformatted specs of > >>> > >>>HTML > >>> > >>> > >>>>>4.01, CSS 1, 2, 2.1 specs. The url was http://www.visiomode.com/docs/ > >>> > >>>and > >>> > >>> > >>>>>there were CHMs and web versions. > >>>>> > >>>>>I just found out that I didn't follow the proper procedure to publish > >>> > >>>these > >>> > >>> > >>>>>and I want to say that I'm sorry and express my apologies. I did read > >>> > >>>the > >>> > >>> > >>>>>document use statement which was linked from HTML 4.01 mainpage, but > >>> > >>>maybe I > >>> > >>> > >>>>>should have been more careful. Your statement > >>>>>(http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents-19990405) > > > > grants > > > >>>the > >>> > >>> > >>>>>use and distribution but maybe I was crossing the line with the > >>> > >>>reformatted > >>> > >>> > >>>>>versions, although I didn't change the content/HTML code. > >>>>> > >>>>>I made CHMs and web versions, so maybe my versions were actually > >>> > >>>derivatives > >>> > >>> > >>>>>and not only distribution of your material. > >>>>> > >>>>>So, I want to now ask for your permission to do the conversion (well, > >>> > >>>it's > >>> > >>> > >>>>>already done), and the permission of distribution. If you haven't seen > >>> > >>>these > >>> > >>> > >>>>>reformatted specs, I can email them/put them somewhere for you to view. > >>>>> > >>>>>There is a discussion at alt.html wth the subject line "W3C specs > >>>>>reformatted." > >>>>> > >>>>>So, sorry again for my hasty actions... I tried to follow the right > >>>>>procedure, but apparently I made an error. > >>>>> > >>>>>Ilkka Huotari > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>-- > >> > >> > >>World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > >> > >>Janet Daly, Head of Communications > >>MIT/CSAIL, Building 32-G518 > >>32 Vassar Street > >>Cambridge, MA 02139 > >> > >>voice: 617.253.5884 > >>fax: 617.258.5999 > >>http://www.w3.org/ > >>janet@w3.org > >> > >> > > -- > > > World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > > Janet Daly, Head of Communications > MIT/CSAIL, Building 32-G518 > 32 Vassar Street > Cambridge, MA 02139 > > voice: 617.253.5884 > fax: 617.258.5999 > http://www.w3.org/ > janet@w3.org > >
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2004 08:43:43 UTC